Versions

 

HC-1.3.10

In order to perform its duties more efficiently, the Board may set up committees where it feels appropriate with specific responsibilities, which must be documented. Where committees are set up, they should keep full minutes of their activities and meet regularly to fulfil their mandates. In particular, there are three areas where there is a need for checks and balances within the Board itself:

a) The nomination of Directors;
b) The remuneration of Directors; and
c) The audit of the bank's financial performance.

In these areas, executive Directors have clear potential conflicts of interest. Nomination is all about the continuation of their own jobs and the jobs of their colleagues and potential new colleagues. Remuneration is all about the rewards that executive Directors and/or senior management receive for their services to the bank. Audit concerns the probity of the financial and non-financial reporting of the performance of the company by the very same persons who are responsible for its performance.

For larger banks that deal with the general public, committees can be a more efficient mechanism to assist the main Board in its monitoring and control of the activities of the bank. The establishment of committees should not mean that the role of the Board is diminished, or that the Board becomes fragmented. Each Committee must have a clear written mandate outlining its purpose, objectives and responsibilities, including composition, frequency of meetings and reporting relationships.