EN-2 EN-2 Investigations
EN-2.1 EN-2.1 Legal Source
EN-2.1.1
Articles 121 to 123 of the CBB Law empower the CBB to order investigations of licensees, in order to help it assess a licensee's compliance with the provisions of the CBB Law. Such investigations may be carried out either by its own officials or
appointed experts . Articles 111 and 124 require licensees to make available to the CBB's inspectors andappointed experts their books and other records, and to provide all relevant information within the time limits deemed reasonable by the inspectors and/orappointed experts .Amended: October 2011
Amended: January 2007EN-2.2 EN-2.2 CBB Policy
EN-2.2.1
The CBB uses its own inspectors to undertake on-site examinations of licensees as an integral part of its regular supervisory efforts. In addition, the CBB may commission special investigations of licensees in order to help it assess their compliance with CBB requirements, as contained in Article 121 of the CBB Law. Such investigations may be carried out either by the CBB's own officials, by duly qualified experts appointed for the purpose by the CBB ('
appointed experts '), or a combination of the two.Amended: October 2011
Amended: January 2007EN-2.2.2
Failure by licensees to cooperate fully with the CBB's inspectors, or its
appointed experts , or to respond to their examination reports within the time limit specified, will be treated as demonstrating a material lack of cooperation with the CBB which will result in other enforcement measures being considered, as described elsewhere in this Module. This guidance is supported by Article 124(a) of the CBB Law.Amended: October 2011
Amended: January 2007EN-2.2.3
The CBB may appoint an individual or a firm as an
appointed expert . Examples ofappointed experts are lawyers, audit firms and expert witnesses. The appointment ofappointed experts is not necessarily indicative of a contravention of CBB requirements or suspicion of such a contravention. For instance, anappointed expert may be commissioned to provide an expert opinion on a technical matter.Amended: October 2011
Amended: January 2007EN-2.2.4
Appointed experts report in a form and within a scope defined by the CBB, and are solely responible to the CBB for the work they undertake in relation to the investigation concerned. The report produced by theappointed experts is the property of the CBB (but is usually shared by the CBB with the firm concerned). The cost of theappointed experts' work must be borne by the licensee concerned.Amended: October 2011
Amended: January 2007EN-2.2.5
In selecting an
appointed expert , the CBB will take into account the level of fees proposed and aim to limit these to the lowest level consistent with an adequate review of the matters at hand, given the qualifications, track record and independence of the persons concerned. Because the costs of such investigations are met by the licensee, the CBB makes only selective use ofappointed experts , when essential to supplement CBB's other supervisory tools and resources.Amended: October 2011
Amended: January 2007EN-2.2.6
[This Paragraph was moved to Section BR-3.5]
Deleted: October 2011
Amended: January 2007EN-2.2.7
[This Paragraph was moved to Section BR-3.5]
Deleted: October 2011
Adopted: January 2007EN-2.2.8
[This Paragraph was moved to Section BR-3.5]
Deleted: October 2011
Adopted: January 2007EN-2.2.6
The CBB may commission reports, which require
appointed experts to review information from another company within the reportinginvestment firm licensee's group even when that other entity is not subject to any CBB requirements.Amended: October 2011
Adopted: January 2007EN-2.2.7
In accordance with Articles 114 and 123 of the CBB Law,
investment firm licensee must provide all relevant information and assistance toappointed experts on demand.Amended: October 2011
Adopted: January 2007EN-2.2.11
[This Paragraph was moved to Section BR-3.5]
Deleted: October 2011
Adopted: January 2007EN-2.3 EN-2.3 Procedure
[The Content of this Section was moved to Section BR-3.5 in October 2011]
EN-2.3.1
All proposals for to appoint
investigators require approval by an Executive Director or more senior official of the CBB. The appointment will be made in writing, and made directly with theinvestigators concerned. A separate letter is sent to the licensee, notifying them of the appointment. At the CBB's discretion, a trilateral meeting may be held at any point, involving the CBB and representatives of the licensee and theinvestigators , to discuss any aspect of the investigation.Amended: October 2009
Adopted: January 2007EN-2.3.2
Following the completion of the investigation, the CBB will normally provide feedback on the findings of the investigation to the
investment firm licensee concerned.Adopted: January 2007EN-2.4 EN-2.4 The Required Report
[The Content of this Section was moved to Section BR-3.5 in October 2011]
EN-2.4.1
The scope of the required report will be determined and detailed by the CBB in the appointment letter. Commissioned
investigators will normally be required to report on one or more of the following aspects of alicensee's business:a) Accounting and other records;b) Internal control systems;c) Returns of information provided to the CBB;d) Operations of certain departments; and/ore) Other matters specified by the CBB.Adopted: October 2009EN-2.4.2
Investigators will be required to form an opinion on whether, during the period examined, thelicensee is in compliance with the relevant provisions of the CBB Law and the CBB's relevant requirements, as well as other requirements of Bahrain Law and, where relevant, industry best practice locally and/or internationally.Adopted: October 2009EN-2.4.3
The
investigators report should follow the format set out in Appendix EN-1 in Part B of Rulebook Volume 4.Adopted: October 2009EN-2.4.4
Unless otherwise directed by the CBB, the report should be discussed with the Board of Directors and/or senior management in advance of it being sent to the CBB.
Adopted: October 2009EN-2.4.5
Where the report is
qualified by exception , the report must clearly set out the risks which thelicensee runs by not correcting the weakness, with an indication of the severity of the weakness, should it not be corrected.Investigators will be expected to report on the type, nature and extent of any weaknesses found during their work, as well as the implications of a failure to address and resolve such weaknesses.Adopted: October 2009EN-2.4.6
If the
investigators conclude, after discussing the matter with thelicensee , that they will give a negative opinion (as opposed to onequalified by exception ) or that the issue of the report will be delayed, they must immediately inform the CBB in writing giving an explanation in this regard.Adopted: October 2009EN-2.4.7
The report must be completed, dated and submitted, together with any comments by Directors or management (including any proposed timeframe within which the licensee has committed to resolving any issues highlighted by the report), to the CBB within the timeframe applicable.
Adopted: October 2009EN-2.5 EN-2.5 Other Notifications to the CBB
[The Content of this Section was moved to Section BR-3.5 in October 2011]
EN-2.5.1
Investigators must communicate to the CBB, during the conduct of their duties, any reasonable belief or concern they may have that any of the requirements of the CBB, including the criteria for licensing alicensee (see Module AU), are not or have not been fulfilled, or that there has been a material loss or there exists a significant risk of material loss in the concernedlicensee , or that the interests of clients are at risk because of adverse changes in the financial position or in the management or other resources of alicensee . Notwithstanding the above, it is primarily thelicensee's responsibility to report such matters to the CBB.Adopted: October 2009EN-2.5.2
The CBB recognises that
investigators cannot be expected to be aware of all circumstances which, had they known of them, would have led them to make a communication to the CBB as outlined above. It is only wheninvestigators , in carrying out their duties, become aware of such a circumstance that they should make detailed inquiries with the above specific duty in mind.Adopted: October 2009EN-2.5.3
If
investigators decide to communicate directly with the CBB in the circumstances set out in Paragraph EN-2.5.1 above, they may wish to consider whether the matter should be reported at an appropriate senior level in thelicensee at the same time and whether an appropriate senior representative of thelicensee should be invited to attend the meeting with the CBB.Adopted: October 2009