Back Custom print Link Text Only Rich Text Print

  • Eligible Credit Risk Mitigation (‘CRM’) Techniques

    • CM-2.3.3

      Bahraini Islamic bank licensee must recognise an eligible CRM technique in the calculation of an exposure whenever it has used this technique to calculate the risk-based capital requirements under Chapter CA-4. Eligible credit risk mitigation techniques for large exposures are those that meet the minimum requirements and eligibility criteria for the recognition of unfunded credit protection and financial collateral that qualify under Chapter CA-4. Other forms of collaterals, e.g. receivables, commercial and residential real estate are not eligible to reduce exposure values for large exposure purposes unless the title deeds, in the case of real estate, are held in the name of the licensee and it is able to demonstrate that it has the ability to realise the value of the collateral.

      Added: June 2022

    • CM-2.3.4

      In accordance with Paragraph CA-4.7.27, hedges with maturity mismatches are recognised only when their original maturities are equal to or greater than 1 year and the residual maturity of a hedge is not less than 3 months.

      Added: June 2022

    • CM-2.3.5

      If there is a maturity mismatch in respect of credit risk mitigants (collateral, on balance sheet netting, guarantees and Shari’a compliant hedging instruments for credit protection) recognised under Paragraph CA-4.7.27, the adjustment of the credit protection for the purpose of calculating large exposures must be calculated according to CA-4.7.28.

      Added: June 2022

    • CM-2.3.6

      Bahraini Islamic bank licensee must reduce the value of the exposure to the original counterparty by the amount of eligible CRM technique recognised under Chapter CA-4. The recognised amount is:

      (a) The value of the protected portion in the case of unfunded credit protection;
      (b) The value of the portion of the claim collateralised by the market value of the recognised financial collateral when the licensee uses the simple approach under Section CA-4.7; and
      (c) The value of the collateral adjusted after applying the required haircuts, in the case of financial collateral when the licensee applies the comprehensive approach (see Section CA-4.7).
      Added: June 2022

    • CM-2.3.7

      The exposure value for instruments that give rise to counterparty credit risk and are not securities financing transactions, must be the exposure at default according to the standardised approach for the purpose of computing capital adequacy (See Module CA).

      Added: June 2022

    • CM-2.3.8

      Off-balance sheet items must be converted into credit exposure equivalents through the use of credit conversion factors (‘CCFs’) by applying the CCFs set-out in Section CA-4.5, with a floor of 10 percent.

      Added: June 2022

    • CM-2.3.9

      Shari’a compliant hedging instruments including those used for credit protection must be converted into positions following Section CA-4.5. These instruments are decomposed into their individual legs.

      Added: June 2022

    • CM-2.3.10

      For Shari’a compliant hedging instruments for credit protection that represent sold protection, the exposure to the referenced name must be the amount due in cases where the referenced name triggers the instrument, minus the absolute value of the credit protection.

      Added: June 2022

    • CM-2.3.11

      In case of syndicated facilities initially underwritten by the licensee, the nominal amount would include only the licensee’s share of the syndication and any amounts for which binding commitments from other financial institutions are not available or have not been sold down. Where a binding commitment is available, that amount would be excluded in calculation of the large exposures. See Section CM-2.6 for exemptions.

      Added: June 2022