• CA-5.1 CA-5.1 Trading Book

    • Definition of the Trading Book and Introduction

      • CA-5.1.1

        "Market risk" is defined as the risk of losses in on- and off-balance sheet positions arising from movements in market prices. The risks that are subject to the market risk capital requirement are:

        (a) Equity position risk in the trading book;35
        (b) Benchmark risk in trading positions in Sukuk (see Chapter CA-8);
        (c) Foreign exchange risk; and
        (d) Commodities and inventory risk.

        35 An equity position treated under "equity exposures in the banking book" is dealt with under the credit risk, as set out in Paragraphs CA-4.8.7 to CA-4.8.15.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.2

        A trading book consists of positions in financial instruments, foreign exchange and commodities and inventories held either with trading intent or in order to hedge other elements of the trading book. To be eligible for trading book capital treatment, financial instruments must be free of any restrictions on their tradability. In addition, positions must be frequently and accurately valued, and the portfolio must be actively managed. Open equity stakes in Shari'a compliant hedge funds, private equity investments and real estate holdings do not meet the definition of the trading book, owing to significant constraints on the ability of banks to liquidate these positions and value them reliably on a daily basis. Such holdings must therefore be held in the Islamic bank licensee's banking book and treated as equity holding in corporates, except real estate which must be treated as per Paragraph CA-4.2.27 and Chapter CA-9 of this Module.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.3

        A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity. Financial instruments include both primary financial instruments (or cash instruments) and forward financial instruments.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.4

        A financial asset is any asset that is cash, the right to receive cash or another financial asset; or the contractual right to exchange financial assets on potentially favourable terms, or an equity instrument. A financial liability is the contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset or to exchange financial liabilities under conditions that are potentially unfavourable.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.5

        Trading positions are defined as those positions of a bank that are held for short -term resale and/or with the intent of benefiting from actual or expected short-term price movements or to lock in arbitrage profits, and may include for example proprietary positions, positions arising from client servicing (e.g. matched principal broking) and market making. Islamic bank licensees must have clearly outlined policies and procedures for including or not including any position in the trading book for purposes of calculating their regulatory capital requirement, to ensure compliance with the criteria for trading book set forth in this section and taking into account the Islamic bank licensee's risk management capabilities and practices. Such policies must be commensurate with the Islamic bank licensee's capabilities and capacities for risk management. The Islamic bank licensee must have well-documented procedures to comply with stated policies, which must be fully documented and subject to periodic internal audit.

        January 2015

    • Policies and Procedures

      • CA-5.1.6

        Policies and procedures must, at a minimum, address the following:

        (a) The activities the Islamic bank licensee considers to be trading and as constituting part of the trading book for regulatory capital purposes;
        (b) The extent to which an exposure can be marked-to-market daily by reference to an active, liquid two-way market;
        (c) For exposures that are marked-to-model, the extent to which the Islamic bank licensee can:
        (i) Identify the material risks of the exposure;
        (ii) Hedge (Sharia compliant hedging) the material risks of the exposure and the extent to which hedging instruments would have an active, liquid two-way market; and
        (iii) Derive reliable estimates for the key assumptions and parameters used in the model;
        (d) The extent to which the Islamic bank licensee can and is required to generate valuations for the exposure that can be validated by external parties in a consistent manner;
        (e) The extent to which legal restrictions or other operational requirements would impede the Islamic bank licensee's ability to effect an immediate liquidation of the exposure;
        (f) The extent to which the Islamic bank licensee is required to, and can, actively risk manage the exposure within its trading operations; and
        (g) The criteria for and the extent to which the Islamic bank licensee may transfer risk or exposures between the banking and the trading books.

        The list above is not intended to provide a series of tests that a product or group of related products must pass to be eligible for inclusion in the trading book. Rather, the list provides a minimum set of key points that must be addressed by the policies and procedures for overall management of an Islamic bank licensee's trading book.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.7

        The basic requirements for positions eligible to receive trading book capital treatment are:

        (a) Clearly documented trading strategy for the position/instrument or portfolios, approved by senior management (which would include expected holding horizon);
        (b) Clearly defined policies and procedures for the active management of the position, which must include the following points:
        (i) Positions are managed on a trading desk;
        (ii) Position limits are set and monitored for appropriateness;
        (iii) Dealers have the autonomy to enter into/manage the position within agreed limits and according to the agreed strategy;
        (iv) Positions are marked to market at least daily and when marking to model the parameters must be assessed on a daily basis;
        (v) Positions are reported to senior management as an integral part of the Islamic bank licensee's risk management process; and
        (vi) Positions are actively monitored with reference to market information sources (assessment must be made of the market liquidity or the ability to hedge positions or the portfolio risk profiles). This includes assessing the quality and availability of market inputs to the valuation process, level of market turnover, sizes of positions traded in the market, etc.; and
        (c) Clearly defined policy and procedures to monitor the positions against the Islamic bank licensee's trading strategy including the monitoring of turnover and stale positions in the Islamic bank licensee's trading book.
        January 2015

    • Prudent Valuation Guidance for the Trading book and the Banking Book

      • CA-5.1.8

        This Section provides Islamic bank licensees with guidance on prudent valuation for positions that are accounted for at fair value, whether they are in the trading book or in the banking book. This guidance is especially important for positions without actual market prices or observable inputs to valuation, as well as less liquid positions which, although they will not be excluded from the trading book solely on grounds of lesser liquidity, raise CBB's concerns about prudent valuation.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.8.A

        Positions in the Islamic bank licensee's own eligible regulatory capital instruments are deducted from capital. Positions in other banks', securities firms', and other financial entities' eligible regulatory capital instruments, as well as intangible assets, are subject to the same treatment as that set down by the CBB for such assets held in the banking book (see Chapter CA-2 of this Module).

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.9

        The valuation guidance set forth below is not intended to require Islamic bank licensees to change valuation procedures for financial reporting purposes. The CBB will assess an Islamic bank licensee's valuation procedures for consistency with this guidance. One factor in the CBB's assessment of whether an Islamic bank licensee must take a valuation adjustment for regulatory purposes under Paragraphs CA-5.1.18.A to CA-5.1.20 is the degree of consistency between the Islamic bank licensee's valuation procedures and these guidelines.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.9A

        A framework for prudent valuation practices must at a minimum include the requirements outlined in this Section.

        January 2015

    • Systems and Controls

      • CA-5.1.10

        Islamic bank licensees must have robust systems and controls, with documented policies and procedures for the valuation process. These systems must be integrated with the Islamic bank licensees' enterprise risk management processes and must have the ability to give confidence to the CBB and management regarding the reliability of the valuations. These policies and procedures must include: (a) clearly defined responsibilities of the personnel and departments involved in the valuation; (b) sources of market information, and review of their reliability; (c) frequency of independent valuations; (d) timing of closing prices; (e) procedures for adjusting valuations between periods; (f) ad-hoc verification procedures; and (g) reporting lines for the valuation department that must be independent of the front office. Such policies and procedures must also take into consideration compliance with IFRS or AAOIFI accounting standards as applicable and CBB requirements.

        January 2015

    • Valuation Methodologies

      • Marking to Market

        • CA-5.1.11

          Marking-to-market is at least the daily valuation of positions at readily available close out prices that are sourced independently. Examples of readily available close out prices include exchange prices, screen prices, or quotes from several independent reputable brokers.

          January 2015

        • CA-5.1.12

          Islamic bank licensees must mark-to-market as much as possible. The more prudent side of bid/offer must be used unless the bank is a significant market maker in a particular position type and it can close out at mid-market. Islamic bank licensees must maximise the use of relevant observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable inputs when estimating fair value using a valuation technique. However, observable inputs or transactions may not be relevant, such as in a forced liquidation or distressed sale, or transactions may not be observable, such as when markets are inactive. In such cases, the observable data must be considered, but may not be determinative.

          January 2015

      • Marking to Model

        • CA-5.1.13

          Only where marking-to-market is not possible must Islamic bank licensees mark-to-model, but this must be demonstrated to be prudent. Marking-to-model is defined as any valuation which has to be benchmarked, extrapolated or otherwise calculated from a market input.

          January 2015

        • CA-5.1.14

          When marking to model, an extra degree of conservatism is appropriate. The CBB will consider the following in assessing whether a mark-to-model valuation is prudent:

          (a) Senior management should be aware of the elements of the trading book or of other fair-valued positions which are subject to mark to model and should understand the materiality of the uncertainty this creates in the reporting of the risk/performance of the business;
          (b) Market inputs should be sourced, to the extent possible, in line with market prices (as discussed above). The appropriateness of the market inputs for the particular position being valued should be reviewed regularly;
          (c) Where available, generally accepted valuation methodologies for particular products should be used as far as possible;
          (d) Where the model is developed by the licensee itself, it should be based on appropriate assumptions, which have been assessed and challenged by suitably qualified parties independent of the development process. The model should be developed or approved independently of the front office. It should be independently tested. This includes validating the mathematics, the assumptions and the software implementation;
          (e) There should be formal change control procedures in place and a secure copy of the model should be held and periodically used to check valuations;
          (f) Risk management should be aware of the weaknesses of the models used and how best to reflect those in the valuation output;
          (g) The model should be subject to periodic review to determine the accuracy of its performance (e.g. assessing continued appropriateness of the assumptions, analysis of P&L versus risk factors, comparison of actual close out values to model outputs); and
          (h) Valuation adjustments should be made as appropriate, for example, to cover the uncertainty of the model valuation (see also valuation adjustments in Paragraphs CA-5.1.7 to CA-5.1.20).
          January 2015

    • Independent Price Verification

      • CA-5.1.15

        Independent price verification is distinct from daily mark-to-market. It is the process by which market prices or model inputs are regularly verified for accuracy. While daily marking-to-market may be performed by dealers, verification of market prices or model inputs must be performed by a unit independent of the dealing room, at least monthly (or, depending on the nature of the market/trading activity, more frequently). It need not be performed as frequently as daily mark-to-market, since the objective, i.e. independent, marking of positions, should reveal any error or bias in pricing, which should result in the elimination of inaccurate daily marks.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.16

        Independent price verification entails a higher standard of accuracy in that the market prices or model inputs are used to determine profit and loss figures, whereas daily marks are used primarily for management reporting in between reporting dates. For independent price verification, where pricing sources are more subjective, e.g. only one available broker quote, prudent measures such as valuation adjustments may be appropriate.

        January 2015

    • Valuation Adjustments

      • CA-5.1.17

        As part of their procedures for marking to market, Islamic bank licensees must establish and maintain procedures for considering valuation adjustments. Islamic bank licensees using third-party valuations must consider whether valuation adjustments are necessary. Such considerations are also necessary when marking to model.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.18

        Islamic bank licensees must consider the following valuation adjustments/reserves at a minimum: unearned profit, close-out costs, operational risks, early termination, investing and funding costs, and future administrative costs and, where appropriate, model risk.

        January 2015

    • Adjustment to the Current Valuation of Less Liquid Positions for Regulatory Capital Purposes

      • CA-5.1.18.A

        Islamic bank licensees must establish and maintain procedures for judging the necessity of and calculating an adjustment to the current valuation of less liquid positions for regulatory capital purposes. This adjustment may be in addition to any changes to the value of the position required for financial reporting purposes and must be designed to reflect the illiquidity of the position. Islamic bank licensees must consider the need for an adjustment to a position's valuation to reflect current illiquidity whether the position is marked to market using market prices or observable inputs, third-party valuations or marked to model.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.19

        Bearing in mind that the underlying 10-day assumptions made about liquidity in the market risk capital charge may not be consistent with the Islamic bank licensee's ability to sell or hedge out less liquid positions, where appropriate, Islamic bank licensees must take an adjustment to the current valuation of these positions, and review their continued appropriateness on an on-going basis. Reduced liquidity may have arisen from market events. Additionally, close-out prices for concentrated positions and/or stale positions must be considered in establishing the adjustments. Islamic bank licensees must consider all relevant factors when determining the appropriateness of the adjustments for less liquid positions. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the amount of time it would take to hedge out the position/risks within the position, the average volatility of bid/offer spreads, the availability of independent market quotes (number and identity of market makers), the average and volatility of trading volumes (including trading volumes during periods of market stress), market concentrations, the aging of positions, the extent to which valuation relies on marking-to-model, and the impact of other model risks not included in Paragraph CA-5.1.18.A.

        January 2015

      • CA-5.1.20

        The adjustment to the current valuation of less liquid positions made under Paragraph CA-5.1.19 must impact Tier 1 regulatory capital and may exceed those valuation adjustments made under financial reporting standards and Paragraphs CA-5.1.17 and CA-5.1.18.

        January 2015