• Overarching Issues

    • CA-4.7.1

      The exposure in respect of an obligor or other, counterparty can be further adjusted or reduced by taking into account the credit risk mitigation (CRM) techniques employed by Islamic banks (off-balance sheet items will first be converted into on-balance sheet equivalents prior to the CRM being applied).

      January 2015

    • CA-4.7.2

      The effects of CRM will not be double counted. Therefore, no additional recognition of CRM for regulatory capital purposes is applicable on claims for which an issue-specific rating is used that already reflects that CRM.

      January 2015

    • CA-4.7.3

      While the use of CRM techniques reduces or transfers credit risk, it simultaneously may increase other risks (residual risks). Residual risks include legal, operational, liquidity and market risks. Therefore, it is imperative that Islamic bank licensees employ robust procedures and processes to control these risks, including strategy; consideration of the underlying credit; valuation; policies and procedures; systems; control of roll-off risks; and management of concentration risk arising from the Islamic bank licensee's use of CRM techniques and its interaction with the Islamic bank licensee's overall credit risk profile. Where these risks are not adequately controlled, the CBB may impose additional capital charges or take supervisory actions.

      January 2015

    • CA-4.7.4

      The collateral used as a part of CRM must be compliant with Shari'a requirements. The collateralisation28 must be properly documented in a security agreement or in the body of a contract to the extent permissible by Shari'a, and must be binding on all parties and legally enforceable in the relevant jurisdictions. The Islamic bank licensee must ensure that the CRM documentation is legally enforceable and must carry out periodic reviews to confirm its enforceability at all times. The Islamic bank licensee cannot recognise a commitment to provide collateral or a guarantee as an eligible CRM unless such a commitment is actually executed.


      28 Generally, in banks such collateralisation takes place under the concept of "Rahn" or "Kafalah".

      January 2015

    • CA-4.7.5

      There should be a negligible positive correlation, if any, between the value of collateral and the credit quality of a counterparty. Consequently, securities issued by a counterparty or its related entities are not eligible as collateral.

      January 2015

    • CA-4.7.6

      For a collateralised transaction — such as Shari'a-compliant alternatives to repo/reverse repo or borrowing/lending of Sukuk and Islamic securities — capital requirements must be applicable on either side of the transaction.

      January 2015