• CA-4.2 CA-4.2 Segregation of Claims

    • Claims on Sovereigns

      • CA-4.2.1

        Claims on governments of GCC member states (hereinafter referred to as GCC) and their central banks are normally risk weighted at 0%. Claims on other sovereigns and their central banks are given a preferential risk weighting of 0% where such claims are denominated and funded in the relevant domestic currency of that sovereign/central bank (e.g. if a Bahraini bank has a claim on government of Australia and the loan is denominated and funded in Australian dollar, it will be risk weighted at 0%). Such preferential risk weight for claims on GCC/other sovereigns and their central banks are allowed only if the relevant supervisor also allows 0% risk weighting to claims on its sovereign and central bank.

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.2

        Claims on sovereigns other than those referred to in Paragraph CA-4.2.1 must be assigned risk weights as follows:

        Credit Assessment AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BBB- BB+ to B- Below B- Unrated
        Risk Weight 0% 20% 50% 100% 150% 100%
        January 2015

    • Claims on International Organisations

      • CA-4.2.3

        Claims on the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank receive a 0% risk weight.

        January 2015

    • Claims on Non-central Government Public Sectors Entities (PSEs)

      • CA-4.2.4

        Any claims on the Bahraini PSEs listed in Appendix CA-8 are treated as claims on the government of Bahrain and are eligible for 0% risk weighting.

        Amended: April 2016
        Added: January 2015

      • CA-4.2.4A

        In addition to the Bahraini PSEs listed in Appendix CA-8, existing exposures to the following entities which have been removed from the list of PSEs as of 1st March 2016, will be grandfathered and will remain eligible for 0% risk weighting until the final maturity or sale of such exposure:

        (a) Durrat Khaleej Al Bahrain Company;
        (b) Hawar Island Development Company;
        (c) Lulu Tourism Company; and
        (d) Al Awali Real Estate Company.
        Added: April 2016

      • CA-4.2.4B

        Any new claims to the entities listed under Paragraph CA-4.2.4A are subject to the normal risk weights as outlined in this Section.

        Added: April 2016

      • CA-4.2.5

        Where other supervisors also treat claims on named PSEs as claims on their sovereigns, claims to those PSEs are treated as claims on the respective sovereigns as outlined in Paragraphs CA-4.2.1 and CA-4.2.2. These PSEs must be shown on a list maintained by the concerned central bank or financial regulator. Where PSE's are not on such a list, they must be subject to the treatment outlined in Paragraph CA-4.2.6.

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.6

        Claims on all other (foreign) PSEs (i.e. not having sovereign treatment) denominated and funded in the home currency of the sovereign must be risk weighted as allowed by their home country supervisors, provided the sovereign carries rating BBB- or above. Claims on PSEs with no explicit home country weighting or to PSEs in countries of BB+ sovereign rating and below are subject to ECAI ratings as per the following table:

        Credit Assessment AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BBB- BB+ to B- Below B- Unrated
        Risk Weight 20% 50% 100% 100% 150% 100%
        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.7

        Claims on commercial companies owned by governments must be risk weighted as normal commercial entities unless they are in the domestic currency and covered by a government guarantee in the domestic currency that satisfies the conditions in Section CA-4.7 in which case they may take the risk weight of the concerned government.

        January 2015

    • Claims on Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs)

      • CA-4.2.8

        MDBs currently eligible for a 0% risk weight are: the World Bank Group comprised of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the African Development Bank (AfDB), the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), the European Investment Bank (EIB), the European Investment Fund (EIF), the Nordic Investment Bank (NIB), the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB), the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) and the Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC), Arab Monetary Fund (AMF), the Council of Europe Development Bank (CEDB), the Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa (ABEDA), Council of European Resettlement Fund (CERF) and the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development (KFAED).

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.9

        The claims on MDBs, which do not qualify for the 0% risk weighting above, must be assigned risk weights as follows:

        Banks Credit Quality Grades AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BBB- BB+ to B- Below B- Unrated
        Risk weights 20% 50% 50% 100% 150% 50%
        January 2015

    • Claims on Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks

      • CA-4.2.10

        Claims on banks must be risk weighted as given in the following table. No claim on an unrated bank may receive a risk weight lower than that applied to claims on its sovereign of incorporation (see guidance in Paragraph CA-4.2.11A for self-liquidating letters of credit).

        Banks Credit Quality Grades AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BBB- BB+ to B- Below B- Unrated
        Standard risk weights 20% 50% 50% 100% 150% 50%
        Preferential risk weight 20% 20% 20% 50% 150% 20%
        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.11

        Short-term claims on locally incorporated banks must be assigned a risk weighting of 20% where such claims on the banks are of an original maturity of 3 months or less denominated and funded in either BD or US$. A preferential risk weight that is one category more favourable than the standard risk weighting must be assigned to claims on foreign banks licensed in Bahrain of an original maturity of 3 months or less denominated and funded in the relevant domestic currency (other than claims on banks that are rated below B-). Such preferential risk weight for short-term claims on banks licensed in other jurisdictions will be allowed only if the relevant supervisor also allows this preferential risk weighting to short-term claims on its banks.

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.11A

        Self-liquidating letters of credit issued or confirmed by an unrated bank are allowed a risk weighting of 20% without reference to the risk weight of the sovereign of incorporation. All other claims will be subject to the 'sovereign floor' of the country of incorporation of the concerned issuing or confirming bank. See also Paragraph CA-4.5.5.

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.12

        Claims with an (contractual) original maturity under 3 months that are expected to be rolled over (i.e. where the effective maturity is longer than 3 months) do not qualify for a preferential treatment for capital adequacy purposes.

        January 2015

    • Claims on Investment Firms

      • CA-4.2.13

        Claims on category one and category two investment firms which are licensed by the CBB are treated as claims on banks for risk weighting purposes but without the use of preferential risk weight for short-term claims. Claims on category three investment firms licensed by the CBB must be treated as claims on corporates for risk weighting purposes. Claims on investment firms in other jurisdictions will be treated as claims on corporates for risk weighting purposes. However, if the bank can demonstrate that the concerned investment firm is subject to an equivalent capital adequacy regime to this Module and is treated as a bank for risk weighting purposes by its home regulator, then claims on such investment firms must be treated as claims on banks.

        January 2015

    • Claims on Corporates, including Insurance Companies

      • CA-4.2.14

        Risk weighting for corporates including insurance companies is as follows:

        Credit assessment AAA to AA- A+ to A- BBB+ to BB- Below BB- Unrated
        Risk weight 20% 50% 100% 150% 100%
        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.15

        Risk weighting for unrated (corporate) claims will not be given a preferential RW to the concerned sovereign. Credit facilities to small/medium enterprises may be placed in the regulatory retail portfolio in limited cases described below.

        January 2015

    • Risk Weights Based on Underlying Assets

      • CA-4.2.16

        The RW of a debtor, counterparty or other obligor is adjusted if the underlying assets are retail or real estate financed under Murabaha, Ijara, IMB, Istisna' or diminishing Musharakah, as set out in Paragraphs CA-4.2.17 to CA-4.2.20.

        January 2015

    • Claims Included in the Regulatory Retail Portfolios

      • CA-4.2.17

        Retail claims that are included in the regulatory retail portfolio must be risk weighted at 75%, except as provided in Paragraph CA-4.2.21 for the past due receivables.

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.18

        To be included in the regulatory retail portfolio, claims must meet the following criteria:

        (a) Orientation ─ the exposure is to an individual person or persons or to a small business. A small business is a Bahrain-based business with annual turnover below BD 2mn;
        (b) Product ─ The exposure takes the form of any of the following: revolving credits and lines of credit (including credit cards and running finance), personal term finance and leases (e.g. instalment finance, auto finance and leases, student and educational finance, personal finance) and small business facilities and commitments. Islamic products which involve securities (such as Musharakah, Mudarabah, Sukuks and equities), whether listed or not, are specifically excluded from this category. Mortgage finance will be excluded if they qualify for treatment as claims secured by residential property (see below). Finance for purchase of shares are also excluded from the regulatory retail portfolios;
        (c) Granularity ─ The regulatory retail portfolio is sufficiently diversified to a degree that it reduces the risks in the portfolio, warranting a 75% risk weight. No aggregate exposure to one counterpart23 can exceed 0.2% of the overall regulatory retail portfolio; and
        (d) The aggregate receivables (accounts receivable in Murabaha and Istisna, lease payments receivable in IMB, and share purchase plus lease receivables in diminishing Musharakah) due from a single counterparty or person(s) must not exceed BD250,000.

        23 Aggregated exposure means gross amount (i.e. not taking any credit risk mitigation into account) of all forms of debt exposures (e.g. finances or commitments) that individually satisfy the three other criteria. In addition, "to one counterpart" means one or several entities that may be considered as a single beneficiary (e.g. in the case of a small business that is affiliated to another small business, the limit would apply to the bank's aggregated exposure on both businesses).

        January 2015

    • Claims Secured by Residential Real Estate (RRE)

      • CA-4.2.19

        Financing facilities fully secured by first mortgages on RRE that is or will be occupied by the borrower, or that is leased, carry a risk weighting of 75%.

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.19A

        The RW for RRE may be reduced to 35% subject to meeting all of the criteria below:

        (a) The RRE is to be utilised for residential purposes only;
        (b) The subject matter of RRE must be pledged as collateral (or serve as quasi-collateral) to the Islamic bank licensee in the case of Murabaha, IMB or diminishing Musharakah;
        (c) There exists a legal infrastructure in the jurisdiction whereby the Islamic bank licensee can enforce the repossession and liquidation of the RRE; and
        (d) The Islamic bank licensee must obtain a satisfactory legal opinion that foreclosure or repossession as mentioned in (c) above is possible without any impediment.
        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.19B

        The RW for residential mortgage exposure granted under the Social Housing Schemes of the Kingdom of Bahrain may be reduced to 25% subject to meeting conditions, (a) and (b) in CA-4.2.19A. The reduced risk weight is subject to ensuring the compliance with the requirements for timely recognition of expected credit loss (ECL) as per the Credit Risk Management Module (Module CM).

        Amended: October 2022
        Added: July 2019

    • Claims Secured by Commercial Real Estate

      • CA-4.2.20

        Financing facilities secured by mortgages on commercial real estate are subject to a minimum of 100% risk weight but may be subject to higher risk weights depending on the financing structure (see CA-3). If the borrower is rated below BB-, the risk-weight corresponding to the rating must be applied.

        January 2015

    • Past Due Receivables

      • CA-4.2.21

        In the event that accounts receivable or lease payments receivable become past due, the exposure must be risk-weighted in accordance with the following table. The exposures should be risk weighted net of specific provisions (see Paragraph CA-4.3.5 for exposures risk-weighted under Supervisory Slotting Criteria).

        Type RW % of Specific Provisions for Past Due Receivables
        Unsecured exposure (other than a qualifying residential mortgage finance facility) that is 90 days or more past due, net of specific provisions 150%

        100%
        Less than 20% of the outstanding receivables.

        At least 20% of the outstanding receivables.
        Exposure secured by RRE 100% For receivables that are 90 days or more past due.
        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.22

        For the purposes of defining the secured portion of a past due receivable, eligible collateral and guarantees will be the same as for credit risk mitigation purposes.

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.23

        Past due retail receivables are to be excluded from the overall regulatory retail portfolio when assessing the granularity criterion, for risk-weighting purposes.

        January 2015

    • Investments in Equities and Funds (not including Real Estate)

      • CA-4.2.24

        Investments in listed equities below the thresholds mentioned in Chapter CA-2 must be risk weighted at 100% while unlisted equities must be risk weighted at 150% provided they are not subject to other treatments described in this paragraph and in CA-4.2.2526 below. The amount of any significant investments in commercial entities above the 15% and 60% Total Capital materiality thresholds (see Paragraph CA-2.4.25) must be weighted at 800%. Significant investments in the common shares of unconsolidated financial institutions and Mortgage Servicing Rights and Deferred Tax Assets arising from temporary differences must be risk weighted at 250% if they have not already been deducted from CET1 as required by Paragraphs CA-2.4.15 to CA-2.4.24. For risk-weighting of Sukuk, refer to Chapter CA-8.

        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.25

        Investments in funds (e.g. mutual funds, Collective Investment Undertakings etc.) must be risk weighted as follows:

        (a) If the instrument (e.g. units) is rated, it should be risk-weighted according to its external rating (for risk-weighting, it must be treated as a "claim on corporate");
        (b) If not rated, such investment should be treated as an equity investment and risk weighted accordingly (i.e. 100% for listed and 150% for unlisted);
        (c) The Islamic bank licensee can apply to CBB for using the look-through approach for such investments if it can demonstrate that the look-through approach is more appropriate to the circumstances of the Islamic bank licensee;
        (d) If there are no voting rights attached to investment in funds, the investment will not be subjected to consolidation, deduction or additional risk-weighting requirements (in respect of large exposure and significant investment limits);
        (e) For the purpose of determining "large exposure limit" for investment in funds, the look-through approach should be used (even if the look-through approach is not used to risk weight the investment).
        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.26

        CBB may require an Islamic bank licensee to adopt the 'Simple Risk Weight Method' for equities (Section CA-4.4) if the CBB considers that Islamic bank licensee's equity portfolio is significant.

        January 2015

    • Large Exposures over the Limits in Module CM

      • CA-4.2.26A

        The amount of any large exposures exceeding the limits set in Chapter CM-4 must be weighted at 800%.

        January 2015

    • Holdings of Real Estate

      • CA-4.2.27

        See Chapter CA-9 for full details. All direct holdings of real estate by Islamic bank licensees (i.e. owned directly by the Islamic bank licensee on balance sheet) must be risk-weighted at 200%. Premises occupied by the Islamic bank licensee must be risk-weighted at 100%. Investments in Real Estate Companies (by way of investments in subsidiaries or associates or other arrangements such as trusts, funds or REITs) must be risk-weighted at 300% or 400% as outlined in Chapter 9 of this Module. Such equity investments will be subject to the materiality thresholds for commercial companies described in Paragraph CA-2.4.25 and therefore any holdings which amount to 15% or more of Total Capital will be subject to a 800% risk weight.

        January 2015

    • Other Assets

      • CA-4.2.28

        Gold bullion held in own vaults or on an allocated basis to the extent backed by bullion liabilities must be treated as cash and therefore risk-weighted at 0%. In addition, cash items in the process of collection must be risk-weighted at 20%. The standard risk weight for all other assets will be 100%. Investments in regulatory capital instruments issued by banks or investment firms must be risk weighted at a minimum of 100%, unless they are deducted from the regulatory capital according to the corresponding deduction approach in Section CA-2.4 of this Module.

        January 2015

    • Underwriting of Non-trading Book Items

      • CA-4.2.29

        Underwritings of capital instruments issued by other banking, financial or insurance entities are covered in Subparagraph CA-2.4.16(c) and CA-2.4.20(c). The large exposures limits of Chapter CM-4 apply for underwritings. This means the 800% risk weights apply for underwritings in excess of the limits set in Chapter CM-4. The risk weights below apply for exposures within the limits of Chapter CM-4. Where an Islamic bank licensee has acquired assets on its balance sheet in the banking book which it is intending to place with third parties under a formal arrangement, the following risk weightings apply for no more than 90 days. Once the underwriting period has expired, the usual risk weights must apply.

        (a) For holdings of private equity (within large exposures limits), a risk weighting of 100% applies instead of the usual 150% (see Paragraph CA-4.2.24); and
        (b) For holdings of real estate (within large exposures limits), a risk weight of 200% applies instead of the usual 300% or 400% risk weight (see Paragraph CA-4.2.27).
        January 2015

      • CA-4.2.30

        Netting arrangements between financing assets and deposits will be permitted subject to the satisfaction of conditions in this Paragraph. The net exposure can be used for capital adequacy purposes if the Islamic bank licensee has a legally enforceable arrangement for netting or offsetting the financing assets and the deposits, irrespective of whether the counterparty is insolvent or bankrupt. The Islamic bank licensee must have a robust system of monitoring those financing assets and deposits with the counterparty that is subject to the netting arrangements. In using the net exposure for the calculation of capital adequacy, financing assets must be treated as exposures and deposits as collateral in the comprehensive approach (as per the formula provided in Paragraph CA-4.7.23). A zero haircut is applicable, except in the case of a currency mismatch.

        January 2015