• Murabahah and Non-binding MPO

    • CA-3.2.3

      This section is broadly divided into (a) Murabahah and non-binding MPO and (b) binding MPO, as the types of risk faced by the Islamic bank licensee are different at the various stages of the contract for the two categories.

      January 2015

    • CA-3.2.4

      This classification and the distinctions between a non-binding MPO and a binding MPO are subject to the criteria and opinions set by the respective SSB of the Islamic bank licensee.

      January 2015

    • CA-3.2.5

      A Murabahah contract refers to an agreement whereby the Islamic bank licensee sells to a customer at acquisition cost (purchase price plus other direct costs) plus an agreed profit margin, a specified kind of asset that is already in its possession. An MPO contract refers to an agreement whereby the Islamic bank licensee sells to a customer at cost (as above) plus an agreed profit margin, a specified kind of asset that has been purchased and acquired by the Islamic bank licensee based on a Promise to Purchase (PP) by the customer which can be a binding or non-binding PP.

      January 2015

    • CA-3.2.6

      In a Murabahah transaction, the Islamic bank licensee sells an asset that is already available in its possession, whereas in a MPO transaction the Islamic bank licensee acquires an asset in anticipation that the asset will be purchased by the orderer/customer.

      January 2015

    • CA-3.2.7

      The price risk in Murabahah contracts ceases and is replaced by credit risk for the amount receivable from the customer following delivery of the asset. Likewise, in a non-binding MPO transaction, the Islamic bank licensee is exposed to credit risk on the amount receivable from the customer when the latter accepts delivery and assumes ownership of the asset.

      January 2015