Back Custom print Link Text Only Rich Text Print

  • EN-2.1 EN-2.1 CBB Policy

    • EN-2.1.1

      Formal warnings are clearly identified as such and represent the CBB's first level formal enforcement measure. They are intended to clearly set out the CBB's concerns to a licensee or an individual regarding an issue, and should be viewed by the recipient with the appropriate degree of seriousness.

      Amended: October 2010
      Added: October 2007

    • EN-2.1.2

      As indicated in Section EN-1.1, the CBB will usually discuss concerns prior to resorting to a formal enforcement measure, especially where a significant element of judgement is required in assessing compliance with a regulatory requirement.

      Amended: October 2010
      Added: October 2007

    • EN-2.1.3

      Where such discussions fail to resolve matters to the CBB's satisfaction, then it may issue a formal warning. Failure to respond adequately to a formal warning will lead the CBB to consider more severe enforcement measures. However, more severe measures do not require the prior issuance of a formal warning – depending on its assessment of the circumstances, the CBB may decide to have immediate recourse to other measures. Similarly, there may be circumstances where the CBB issues a formal warning without prior discussion with the licensee or person concerned: this would usually be the case where a clear-cut compliance failing has occurred.

      Amended: October 2010
      Added: October 2007

    • EN-2.1.4

      When considering whether to issue a formal warning, the criteria taken into consideration by the CBB therefore include the following:

      (a) the seriousness of the actual or potential contravention, in relation to the requirement(s) concerned and the risks posed to the licensee's customers, market participants and other stakeholders;
      (b) in the case of an actual contravention, its duration and/or frequency of the contravention; the extent to which it reflects more widespread weaknesses in controls and/or management; and the extent to which it was attributable to deliberate or reckless behaviour; and
      (c) the extent to which the CBB's supervisory objectives would be better served by issuance of a formal warning as opposed to another type of regulatory action.
      Amended: October 2010
      Added: October 2007