• CA-A.4 CA-A.4 Transitional Arrangements

    • CA-A.4.1

      For banks applying the IRB approach for credit risk, there will be a capital floor following implementation of this Module. Banks must calculate the difference between: (i) the floor as defined in Paragraph CA-A.4.2 and (ii) the amount as calculated according to Paragraph CA-A.4.3. If the floor amount is larger, banks are required to add 12.5 times the difference to the risk-weighted assets.

      Amended: January 2011
      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.2

      The capital floor is based on previous capital adequacy Rules issued by CBB dated July 2004. It is derived by applying an adjustment factor to the following amount: (i) 8% of the risk-weighted assets, (ii) plus Tier 1 and Tier 2 deductions. The adjustment factor for banks applying the foundation IRB approach for the year 2008 is 95%. The adjustment factor for the year 2009 is 90%, and for the year 2010 is 80%. The following table illustrates the application of the adjustment factors. Additional transitional arrangements including parallel calculation are set out in Paragraphs CA-5.2.45 to CA-5.2.51.

        2008 2009 2010
      Foundation IRB approach 95% 90% 80%
      Amended: January 2011
      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.3

      In the years in which the floor applies, banks must also calculate (i) 8% of total risk-weighted assets as calculated under this Module, (ii) less the difference between total provisions and expected loss amount as described in Section CA-5.7, and (iii) plus other Tier 1 and Tier 2 deductions.

      Amended: January 2011
      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.4

      These prudential floors are also applicable to banks that that do not complete the transition to IRB approach in the years specified in Paragraph CA-2.4.2 to provide time to ensure that individual bank implementations of the IRB approach are sound. However, CBB may develop appropriate bank-by-bank floors periodically.

      Amended: January 2011
      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.5

      Banks which start to use internal models for market risk for one or more risk categories should, over a reasonable period of time, extend the models to all of their operations, subject to the exceptions mentioned in Paragraph CA-A.4.6 below, and move towards a comprehensive model (i.e., one which captures all market risk categories).

      Amended: January 2011
      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.6

      On a transitional basis, banks will be allowed to use a combination of the standardised approach and the internal models approach to measure their market risks provided they should cover a complete risk category (e.g., interest rate risk or foreign exchange risk), i.e., a combination of the two methods will not be allowed within the same risk category1. However, banks presently implementing or further improving their internal models will be allowed some flexibility (including within risk categories) in including all their operations on a worldwide basis. This flexibility shall be subject to the specific prior written approval of the CBB, and such approval will be given on a case-by-case basis and reviewed by the CBB from time to time.


      1 This does not, however, apply to pre-processing techniques which are used to simplify the calculation and whose results become subject to the standardised methodology.

      Amended: January 2011
      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.7

      The CBB will closely monitor banks to ensure that there will be no "cherry-picking" between the standardised approach and the models approach for market risk within a risk category. Banks which adopt a model will not be permitted, save in exceptional circumstances, to revert to the standardised approach.

      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.8

      The CBB recognises that even a bank which uses a comprehensive model for market risk may still incur risks in positions which are not captured by their internal models2, for example, in remote locations, in minor currencies or in negligible business areas3. Any such risks that are not included in a model should be separately measured and reported using the standardised approach described in Chapters CA-9 to CA-13.


      2 Banks may also incur interest rate and equity risks outside of their trading activities. However, there are no explicit capital charges for the price risk in such positions.

      3 For example, if a bank is hardly at all engaged in commodities it will not necessarily be expected to model its commodities risk.

      Amended: January 2011
      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.9

      Transitioning banks are required to move towards a comprehensive internal model approach for market risk.

      Apr 08

    • CA-A.4.10

      The CBB will closely monitor the risk management practices of banks moving towards the models approach for market risk, to ensure that they are in a position to meet all standards once they apply a full-fledged model for any risk category.

      Apr 08