CA-A CA-A Introduction
CA-A.1 CA-A.1 Application
CA-A.1.1
Rules in this Module are applicable to locally incorporated banks (hereinafter referred to as "the banks") on both a stand-alone (i.e. including their foreign branches) and on a consolidated group basis (i.e. including their subsidiaries and any other investments which are included or consolidated into the group accounts or which are required to be consolidated or aggregated for regulatory purposes by the Central Bank of Bahrain ('CBB').
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.1.2
If the banks have investments in banking, securities, financial, insurance and/or commercial entities, the banks will also need to apply rules set out in the Prudential Consolidation and Deduction Requirements Module (Module PCD) for the calculation of their solo and consolidated Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR).
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.1.3
Certain of the requirements relating to gearing (See Chapter CA-15) also apply to Bahrain branches of foreign retail bank licensees.
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.2 CA-A.2 Purpose
Executive Summary
CA-A.2.1
The purpose of this module is to set out the CBB's
capital adequacy Rules and provide guidance on the risk measurements for the calculation of capital requirements by locally incorporated banks. This requirement is supported by Article 44(c) of the Central Bank of Bahrain and Financial Institutions Law (Decree No. 64 of 2006).Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.2.2
Principle 9 of the Principles of Business requires that
conventional bank licensees maintain adequate human, financial and other resources, sufficient to run their business in an orderly manner (see Section PB-1.9). In addition, Condition 5 of CBB's Licensing Conditions (Section LR-2.5) requiresconventional bank licensees to maintain financial resources in excess of the minimum requirements specified in Module CA (Capital Adequacy).Apr 08CA-A.2.3
This Module also sets out the minimum gearing requirements which relevant banks (referred to in Section CA-A.1) must meet as a condition of their licensing.
Apr 08CA-A.2.4
The requirements specified in this Module vary according to the Category of
conventional bank licensee concerned, their inherent risk profile, and the volume and type of business undertaken. The purpose of such requirements is to ensure thatconventional bank licensees hold sufficient capital to provide some protection against unexpected losses, and otherwise allow conventional banks to effect an orderly wind-down of their operations, without loss to their depositors. The minimum capital requirements specified here may not be sufficient to absorb all unexpected losses.Apr 08CA-A.2.5
The CBB requires in particular that the banks maintain adequate capital, in accordance with the requirements of this Module, against their risks.
Apr 08CA-A.2.6
This module provides support for certain other parts of the Rulebook, mainly:
(a) Prudential Consolidation and Deduction Requirements;(b) Licensing and Authorisation Requirements;(c) CBB Reporting Requirements;(d) Credit Risk Management;(e) Operational Risk Management;(f) High Level Controls:(g) Relationship with Audit Firms; and(h) Penalties and Fines.Apr 08Legal Basis
CA-A.2.7
This Module contains the CBB's Directive (as amended from time to time) relating to the capital adequacy of
conventional bank licensees , and is issued under the powers available to the CBB under Article 38 of the CBB Law. The Directive in this Module is applicable to allconventional bank licensees .Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.2.8
For an explanation of the CBB's rule-making powers and different regulatory instruments, see Section UG-1.1.
Adopted: January 2011CA-A.3 CA-A.3 Capital Adequacy Ratio
CA-A.3.1
Historically, on a consolidated basis, the CBB has set a minimum Capital Adequacy Ratio ("CAR") of 12.0% for all locally incorporated banks. Furthermore, on a solo basis, the parent bank has been required to maintain a minimum CAR of 8.0% (i.e. unconsolidated). The arrangements outlined below will apply once banks have been subject to a Pillar 2 risk profile assessment by the CBB or an acceptable audit firm. Until such an assessment has been completed, the existing 12% and 8% minimum capital ratio requirements (as outlined in Module CA-2.5 October 2006 edition) will remain in place.
Apr 08CA-A.3.2
CAR is calculated by applying the regulatory capital to the numerator and risk-weighted assets to the denominator.
Apr 08CA-A.3.3
All locally incorporated banks are required to maintain a capital ratio both on a solo (and a consolidated basis where applicable) above the minimum "trigger" CAR of 8%. Failure to remain above the trigger ratio will result in Enforcement and other measures as outlined in Section CA-1.4.
Apr 08CA-A.3.4
All locally incorporated banks will be required to maintain capital ratios above individually set "target" CARs on a solo and on a consolidated basis. These target CARs will be set at an initial minimum of 8.5% and may in the case of high risk banks be set at levels above the 12.5% target ratio set prior to January 2008. Failure to remain above the target ratio will result in Enforcement and other measures as outlined in Section CA-1.4.
Apr 08Eligible Capital
CA-A.3.5
Banks are allowed three classes of capital (see section CA-2.1) to meet their capital requirements for credit, operational and market risk, as set out below:
Tier 1: Core capital — May be used to support credit, operational and market risk
Tier 2: Supplementary capital — May be used to support credit, operational and market risk; and
Tier 3: Ancillary capital — May be used solely to support market risk.
Apr 08Risk-weighted Assets
CA-A.3.6
Total risk-weighted assets are determined by:
(a) Multiplying the capital requirements for market risk and operational risk by 12.5; and(b) Adding the resulting figures to the sum of risk-weighted assets for credit risk.Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.3.7
For the measurement of their credit risks, banks have a choice, subject to the written approval of the CBB, between two broad methodologies:
(a) One alternative is to measure the risks in a standardised approach, applying the measurement framework described in Chapter CA-3 of this Module; and(b) The second methodology (i.e. internal ratings-based approach) is set out in detail in Chapter CA-5 including the procedure for obtaining the CBB's approval. This methodology is subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. The use of this methodology is, therefore, conditional upon the explicit approval of the CBB.Amended: April 2011
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.3.8
Credit risk — Securitization framework is set out in Chapter CA-6. Banks must apply the securitisation framework for determining regulatory capital requirements on exposures arising from traditional and synthetic securitisations or similar structures that contain features common to both.
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.3.9
For the measurement of their operational risks, banks have a choice, subject to the written approval of the CBB, between two broad methodologies:
(a) One alternative is to measure the risks in a basic indicator approach, applying the measurement framework described in Chapter CA-7 of this Module; and(b) The second alternative methodology (i.e. the standardised approach) is set out in detail in Chapter CA-7 including the procedure for obtaining the CBB's approval. This methodology is subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions (as outlined in Module OM).The use of this methodology is, therefore, conditional upon the explicit approval of the CBB.Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.3.10
For the measurement of their market risk, banks have a choice, subject to the written approval of the CBB, between two broad methodologies:
(a) One alternative is to measure the risks in a standardised approach, applying the measurement frameworks described in Chapters CA-9 to CA-13 of this Module; and(b) The second alternative methodology (i.e. the internal models approach) is set out in detail in Chapter CA-14 including the procedure for obtaining the CBB's approval. This methodology is subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. The use of this methodology is, therefore, conditional upon the explicit approval of the CBB.Amended: April 2011
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.4 CA-A.4 Transitional Arrangements
CA-A.4.1
For banks applying the IRB approach for credit risk, there will be a capital floor following implementation of this Module. Banks must calculate the difference between: (i) the floor as defined in Paragraph CA-A.4.2 and (ii) the amount as calculated according to Paragraph CA-A.4.3. If the floor amount is larger, banks are required to add 12.5 times the difference to the risk-weighted assets.
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.4.2
The capital floor is based on previous capital adequacy Rules issued by CBB dated July 2004. It is derived by applying an adjustment factor to the following amount: (i) 8% of the risk-weighted assets, (ii) plus Tier 1 and Tier 2 deductions. The adjustment factor for banks applying the foundation IRB approach for the year 2008 is 95%. The adjustment factor for the year 2009 is 90%, and for the year 2010 is 80%. The following table illustrates the application of the adjustment factors. Additional transitional arrangements including parallel calculation are set out in Paragraphs CA-5.2.45 to CA-5.2.51.
2008 2009 2010 Foundation IRB approach 95% 90% 80% Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.4.3
In the years in which the floor applies, banks must also calculate (i) 8% of total risk-weighted assets as calculated under this Module, (ii) less the difference between total provisions and expected loss amount as described in Section CA-5.7, and (iii) plus other Tier 1 and Tier 2 deductions.
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.4.4
These prudential floors are also applicable to banks that that do not complete the transition to IRB approach in the years specified in Paragraph CA-2.4.2 to provide time to ensure that individual bank implementations of the IRB approach are sound. However, CBB may develop appropriate bank-by-bank floors periodically.
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.4.5
Banks which start to use internal models for market risk for one or more risk categories should, over a reasonable period of time, extend the models to all of their operations, subject to the exceptions mentioned in Paragraph CA-A.4.6 below, and move towards a comprehensive model (i.e., one which captures all market risk categories).
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.4.6
On a transitional basis, banks will be allowed to use a combination of the standardised approach and the internal models approach to measure their market risks provided they should cover a complete risk category (e.g., interest rate risk or foreign exchange risk), i.e., a combination of the two methods will not be allowed within the same risk category1. However, banks presently implementing or further improving their internal models will be allowed some flexibility (including within risk categories) in including all their operations on a worldwide basis. This flexibility shall be subject to the specific prior written approval of the CBB, and such approval will be given on a case-by-case basis and reviewed by the CBB from time to time.
1 This does not, however, apply to pre-processing techniques which are used to simplify the calculation and whose results become subject to the standardised methodology.
Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.4.7
The CBB will closely monitor banks to ensure that there will be no "cherry-picking" between the standardised approach and the models approach for market risk within a risk category. Banks which adopt a model will not be permitted, save in exceptional circumstances, to revert to the standardised approach.
Apr 08CA-A.4.8
The CBB recognises that even a bank which uses a comprehensive model for market risk may still incur risks in positions which are not captured by their internal models2, for example, in remote locations, in minor currencies or in negligible business areas3. Any such risks that are not included in a model should be separately measured and reported using the standardised approach described in Chapters CA-9 to CA-13.
2 Banks may also incur interest rate and equity risks outside of their trading activities. However, there are no explicit capital charges for the
price risk in such positions.3 For example, if a bank is hardly at all engaged in
commodities it will not necessarily be expected to model itscommodities risk.Amended: January 2011
Apr 08CA-A.4.9
Transitioning banks are required to move towards a comprehensive internal model approach for market risk.
Apr 08CA-A.4.10
The CBB will closely monitor the risk management practices of banks moving towards the models approach for market risk, to ensure that they are in a position to meet all standards once they apply a full-fledged model for any risk category.
Apr 08CA-A.5 CA-A.5 Module History
CA-A.5.1
This module was first issued in July 2004 as part of the conventional principles volume. Any material changes that have subsequently been made to this module are annotated with the calendar quarter date in which the changes were made. Chapter UG-3 provides further guidance on Rulebook maintenance and version control.
Amended: January 2011CA-A.5.1A
The most recent changes are detailed in the Table below.
Summary of Changes
Module Ref. Change Date Description of Changes CA-A.2 10/07 Change categorising Module as a Directive CA-1 to CA-8 01/08 Extensive changes to implement Basel II CA-3.4 04/08 Recognition and mapping of grades for Capital Intelligence CA-3.2.15–18 01/09 New guidance and rules on SMEs CA-A 01/2011 Various minor amendments to ensure consistency in CBB Rulebook. CA-A.2.7 01/2011 Clarified legal basis. CA-6, CA-8, CA-9, CA-10, CA-14 & CA-16 01/2012 Changes in respect of July 2009 and February 2011 amendments to Basel II. CA-3.2.10 and CA-3.2.11A 04/2012 Amendment made for claims on banks dealing with self-liquidating letters of credit. CA-2.1.5, CA-2.1.5A and CA-2.1.5B 04/2013 Clarified Rules dealing with subordinated debt issued. CA-2.1.5(h) 10/2013 Added Rule to include limited general provision against unidentified future losses as part of Tier 2. CA-11.3.7 10/2013 Clarified Rules for excluding positions of a structural nature from the calculation of the net open currency positions. Evolution of Module
CA-A.5.2
Prior to the development of this Module, the CBB had issued various circulars representing regulations relating to
capital adequacy requirements. These circulars and their incorporation into this module are listed below:Circular Ref. Date of Issue Module Ref. Circular Subject ODG/50/98 11 Sep 1998 CA-8 – CA-14 Market Risk Capital Regulations BC/07/02 26 Jun 2002 CA-1.5 Review of PIR by External Auditors OG/78/01 20 Feb 2001 CA-A.3 & CA-1.4 Monitoring of Capital Adequacy BC/01/98 10 Jan 1998 CA-A.3 & CA-1.4 Capital Adequacy Ratio Apr 08CA-A.5.3
The contents retained from the previous Module (Capital Adequacy – Conventional Banks) are effective from the date depicted in the above circulars (see Paragraph CA-A.5.2) or from the dates mentioned in the Summary of Changes. The remainder of the updated Module is effective from January 01, 2008.
Apr 08