Securities Financing Transaction Exposures 37
CA-15.4.4
Where a qualifying master netting agreement is in place, the effects of bilateral netting agreements for
SFTs are recognised on a counterparty by counterparty basis if the agreements are legally enforceable in each relevant jurisdiction upon the occurrence of an event of default and regardless of whether the counterparty is insolvent or bankrupt. In addition, netting agreements must:(a) Provide the non-defaulting party with the right to terminate and close out in a timely manner all transactions under the agreement upon an event of default, including in the event of insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparty;(b) Provide for the netting of gains and losses on transactions (including the value of any collateral) terminated and closed out under it so that a single net amount is owed by one party to the other;(c) Allow for the prompt liquidation or setoff of collateral upon the event of default; and(d) Be, together with the rights arising from provisions required in (a) and (c) above, legally enforceable in each relevant jurisdiction upon the occurrence of an event of default regardless of the counterparty's insolvency or bankruptcy.Added: October 2018
37 The provisions related to qualifying master netting agreements (MNAs) for SFTs are intended for the calculation of the counterparty add-on of the exposure measure of SFTs.
CA-15.4.5
Netting across positions held in the banking book and trading book can only be recognised when the netted transactions fulfil the following conditions:
(a) All transactions are marked to market daily; and(b) The collateral instruments used in the transactions are recognised as eligible financial collateral in the banking book.Added: October 2018
