• (iv) Credit Conversion Factors for Off-Balance Sheet Exposures

    • CA-6.4.18

      For risk-based capital purposes, conventional bank licensees must determine whether, according to the criteria outlined below, an off-balance sheet securitisation exposure qualifies as an 'eligible liquidity facility' or an 'eligible servicer cash advance facility'. All other off-balance sheet securitisation exposures will receive a 100% CCF.

      January 2015

    • Eligible Liquidity Facilities

      • CA-6.4.19

        Conventional bank licensees are permitted to treat off-balance sheet securitisation exposures as eligible liquidity facilities if the following minimum requirements are satisfied:

        (a) The facility documentation must clearly identify and limit the circumstances under which it may be drawn. Draws under the facility must be limited to the amount that is likely to be repaid fully from the liquidation of the underlying exposures and any seller-provided credit enhancements. In addition, the facility must not cover any losses incurred in the underlying pool of exposures prior to a draw, or be structured such that draw-down is certain (as indicated by regular or continuous draws);
        (b) The facility must be subject to an asset quality test that precludes it from being drawn to cover credit risk exposures where the obligor is more than 90 days past due on any material risk in the banking group. In addition, if the exposures that a liquidity facility is required to fund are externally rated securities, the facility can only be used to fund securities that are externally rated investment grade at the time of funding;
        (c) The facility cannot be drawn after all applicable (e.g. transaction-specific and programme-wide) credit enhancements from which the liquidity would benefit have been exhausted; and
        (d) Repayment of draws on the facility (i.e. assets acquired under a purchase agreement or loans made under a lending agreement) must not be subordinated to any interests of any note holder in the programme (e.g. ABCP programme) or subject to deferral or waiver.
        January 2015

      • CA-6.4.20

        Where these conditions are met, the conventional bank licensee may apply a 50% CCF to the eligible facility regardless of the maturity of the facility. However, if an external rating of the facility itself is used for risk-weighting the facility, a 100% CCF must be applied.

        January 2015

      • CA-6.4.21

        [This Paragraph has been deleted in January 2012].

        January 2015

      • CA-6.4.22

        [This Paragraph has been deleted in January 2012].

        January 2015

    • Treatment of Overlapping Exposures

      • CA-6.4.23

        A conventional bank licensee may provide several types of facilities that can be drawn under various conditions. The same conventional bank licensee may be providing two or more of these facilities. Given the different triggers found in these facilities, it may be the case that a conventional bank licensee provides duplicative coverage to the underlying exposures. In other words, the facilities provided by a conventional bank licensee may overlap since a draw on one facility may preclude (in part) a draw under the other facility. In the case of overlapping facilities provided by the same conventional bank licensee, the conventional bank licensee does not need to hold additional capital for the overlap. Rather, it is only required to hold capital once for the position covered by the overlapping facilities (whether they are liquidity facilities or credit enhancements). Where the overlapping facilities are subject to different conversion factors, the conventional bank licensee must attribute the overlapping part to the facility with the highest conversion factor. However, if overlapping facilities are provided by different banks, each conventional bank licensee must hold capital for the maximum amount of the facility (see also Paragraph CA-6.4.6A).

        January 2015

    • Eligible Servicer Cash Advance Facilities

      • CA-6.4.24

        If contractually provided for, servicers may advance cash to ensure an uninterrupted flow of payments to investors so long as the servicer is entitled to full reimbursement and this right is senior to other claims on cash flows from the underlying pool of exposures. A 0% CCF must be applied to such un-drawn servicer cash advances or facilities provided that these are unconditionally cancellable without prior notice.

        January 2015

    • Treatment of Credit Risk Mitigation for Securitisation Exposures

      • CA-6.4.25

        The treatment below applies to a conventional bank licensee that has obtained a credit risk mitigant on a securitisation exposure. Credit risk mitigants include guarantees, credit derivatives, collateral and on-balance sheet netting. Collateral in this context refers to that used to hedge the credit risk of a securitisation exposure rather than the underlying exposures of the securitisation transaction.

        January 2015

      • CA-6.4.26

        When a conventional bank licensee other than the originator provides credit protection to a securitisation exposure, it must calculate a capital requirement on the covered exposure as if it were an investor in that securitisation. If a conventional bank licensee provides protection to an unrated credit enhancement, it must treat the credit protection provided as if it were directly holding the unrated credit enhancement.

        January 2015

    • Collateral

      • CA-6.4.27

        Eligible collateral is limited to that recognised under the standardised approach for CRM (Paragraphs CA-4.3.1 and CA-4.3.2). Collateral pledged by SPSVs may be recognised.

        January 2015

    • Guarantees and Credit Derivatives

      • CA-6.4.28

        Credit protection provided by the entities listed in Paragraph CA-4.5.7 may be recognised. SPSVs cannot be recognised as eligible guarantors. A conventional bank licensee must not recognise any support provided by itself (see also Paragraph CA-6.4.6).

        January 2015

      • CA-6.4.29

        Where guarantees or credit derivatives fulfil the minimum operational conditions as specified in Paragraphs CA-4.5.1 to CA-4.5.6, conventional bank licensees can take account of such credit protection in calculating capital requirements for securitisation exposures.

        January 2015

      • CA-6.4.30

        Capital requirements for the guaranteed/protected portion will be calculated according to CRM for the standardised approach as specified in Paragraphs CA-4.5.8 to CA-4.5.13.

        January 2015

    • Maturity Mismatches

      • CA-6.4.31

        For the purpose of setting regulatory capital against a maturity mismatch, the capital requirement will be determined in accordance with Paragraphs CA-4.6.1 to CA-4.6.4. When the exposures being hedged have different maturities, the longest maturity must be used.

        January 2015